A friend and I were exchanging emails, discussing what makes a good image. These days, with technology, anyone can look at images from around the world 24/7. But are the ones with the most likes really the best images? It’s not always that simple.
Take an extreme example: imagine a picture taken with the same equipment, of the same subject, at the same time—one by a private individual and the other by a well-known celebrity. The celebrity's photo will likely receive millions more likes, even if the two images look identical.
Over four years ago, when I used to be on social media, I would often stare at images I found interesting—like how one might look at paintings in a museum or a book. I would try to figure out what made them so compelling. I’d study the subject, the background, the shadows, the light, and the colours.
Today, I’m inspired by nature—and by two amazing artists from the past: the photography of Ansel Adams and the paintings of Georgia O’Keeffe. Ansel Adams inspires me with his use of light and shadow and how he placed his subjects within their surroundings. As for Georgia O’Keeffe, when she escaped to the desert, her use of bold colours and her larger-than-life flower paintings captured my attention and never let go. I regularly look through books featuring both of their works.
There are many great artists from the past and present. But just like with chocolate brands—once you find one you love, you can either enjoy it or keep looking for something better.
Since I get to decide what I photograph and what I keep, I’m always pushing myself to create better images. That means more than just keeping the subject in focus. I take far fewer images than I used to, and I delete a higher percentage than before. If you love the subject you're photographing, then you owe it the time and effort to make sure it stands out in the images you choose to keep. That image will then give back far more than one that was simply taken and saved without much thought.